[WSJ] This Is Exactly How Trade Wars Begin

by finandlife15/03/2018 22:43

First it’s steel beams, then Jim Beam, then Beemers. Remember that tariffs are effectively taxes.

By Alan S. Blinder

Dear President Trump :

It seems you are about to impose tariffs on imported steel and aluminum. You probably know that just about every economist except Peter Navarro thinks this is a terrible idea.

But it’s not just us economists. Aside from the steel and aluminum industries, virtually the entire business community opposes the tariffs. The stock market took a major hit.

And by the way, when did you stop using the Dow to keep score? You tweeted that “trade wars are good, and easy to win.” Actually, trade wars are bad, and impossible to win.

Voluntary trade is a win-win proposition, as Adam Smith explained in “The Wealth of Nations.” Impeding voluntary trade is a lose-lose proposition. The key word here is “voluntary.” When foreigners rent rooms in your Washington hotel, both you and they win, right? If not, why would they stay there, and why would you accept them as guests?

Next, let’s consider your “easy to win” quip. It is likely that the U.S. can inflict more pain on its trading partners than they can inflict on us, as we rely less on trade than most countries do. Sure. But merely suffering less than your opponent seems a poor definition of “winning.” Trade wars are a pyrrhic form of competition in which even the victor is left worse off.

You say America loses whenever it runs a trade deficit with any country. But in 2017 the U.S. ran a $571 billion trade deficit with the entire world, which necessarily included deficits with dozens of individual countries. Were they all beating us—and if so, at what?

The truth is that America’s huge multilateral trade deficit is made at home.

Here’s why. Nations that invest more than they save must borrow the difference from abroad. Happily, the U.S. can do that because foreign countries have confidence in American securities. When we import more than we export, foreigners get IOUs in return for goods and services Americans want. That sounds more like winning than losing: We get German cars, French wines, and Chinese solar panels, while the Germans, French and Chinese get paper assets. America’s tremendous ability to export IOUs has been called our “exorbitant privilege.” Yes, privilege.

Trade wars have a way of intensifying. Almost immediately after you announced your tariffs, the European Union warned that it would slap penalties on American bourbon—a move likely intended to grab the attention of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. You then replied that the U.S. could impose tariffs on European cars. This is exactly how trade wars escalate: from steel beams to Jim Beam to Beemers. Who knows what comes next?

Your administration’s attempts to understate protectionism’s costs are unconvincing.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross argued—apparently with a straight face—that steel tariffs are no big deal because there’s very little steel in a can of Campbell’s soup. He meant to imply that the effects of tariffs would be limited because steel makes up a tiny share of the overall U.S. economy. That’s true. But if we applied the same principle to every individual industry, we could wind up protecting virtually every American industry that faces foreign competition.

The tariffs also punish American allies more than any other nations. Did you know that the top three exporters of steel to the U.S. are Canada, Brazil and South Korea? Canada is our super-friendly neighbor to the north; it even has a Trump hotel. The Brazilian economy, South America’s largest, is struggling and badly needs exports. South Korea isbour key ally against North Korea and its nuclear threat. You may have granted Canada a temporary exemption, but do you really want to poke these allies in the eye?

Finally, remember that tariffs are effectively taxes. Industries that consume steel employ far more people than those that produce it, so a government-mandated increase in steel prices is almost certain to kill many more jobs than it creates. What’s more, many of those lost jobs will be in manufacturing and other industries that are popular among your own Republican Party base.

If you thought the prospect of punishing China was worth all of these consequences, you should know that you missed your best chance. The Trans-Pacific Partnership could have included the U.S. while leaving China out in the cold. Yet you pulled the U.S. out, leaving an open playing field for China to dominate trade in the region. Has President Xi thanked you enough for that?

Mr. Blinder is a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University and a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Tags:

Economics

Vietnam Access Day 2018 nhà đầu tư ngoại rất quan tâm VN

by Technician15/03/2018 10:28

Tổng mua ròng trên HSX đã đạt 2 tỷ USD

Follow tây à?

FINANDLIFE

Tags:

Economics

Vietnam could make the greatest moves up the rankings

by finandlife12/03/2018 23:31

Key findings

This report sets out our latest long-term global growth projections to 2050 for 32 of the largest economies in the world, accounting for around 85% of world GDP.

Key results of our analysis (as summarised also in the accompanying video) include:

             The world economy could more than double in size by 2050, far outstripping population growth, due to continued technology-driven productivity improvements

             Emerging markets (E7) could grow around twice as fast as advanced economies (G7) on average

             As a result, six of the seven largest economies in the world are projected to be emerging economies in 2050 led by China (1st), India (2nd) and Indonesia (4th)

             The US could be down to third place in the global GDP rankings while the EU27’s share of world GDP could fall below 10% by 2050

             UK could be down to 10th place by 2050, France out of the top 10 and Italy out of the top 20 as they are overtaken by faster growing emerging economies like Mexico, Turkey and Vietnam respectively

             But emerging economies need to enhance their institutions and their infrastructure significantly if they are to realise their long-term growth potential.

PwC

Tags:

Economics

Trump black swan

by finandlife05/03/2018 23:39

=========

Tối ngày 9/3/2018:

Tổng thống Trump ký quyết định áp thuế nhôm, thép nhập khẩu trừ Canada và Mexico

Lệnh áp thuế 25% với nhôm và 10% với thép của ông Trump sẽ có hiệu lực trong 15 ngày

"Ngành công nghiệp sản xuất nhôm và thép có vai trò quan trọng đối với an ninh quốc gia. Nếu không có thép đồng nghĩa quốc gia ấy không còn", ông Trump nói.

Tags:

Economics

VN quá nhanh nhảu

by finandlife27/02/2018 09:10

Nếu chỉ hơn 2 tuần trước, thị trường toàn cầu trải qua sự u ám kinh hoàng khi chỉ số tài sản toàn cầu mất hơn 10% trong thời gian cực ngắn, chỉ số biến động VIX đo lường sự bât ổn chứng khoán Mỹ tăng gần 4 lần, thì hiện nay mọi thứ dần trở về với quỹ đạo bình thường.

Còn nhớ nhà quản lý quỹ Ray Dalio bảo rằng, “If you're holding cash, you're going to feel pretty stupid,” ai mà biết được, thị trường hồi phục theo cách như thế này.

Giá dầu đang dần quay về đỉnh cũ, Dow 30 cũng thế, Nikkei cũng vậy, cả Shanghai cũng phục hồi hình chữ V.

Thị trường chứng khoán VN thì nhanh nhảu hơn, nếu các thị trường kia vẫn còn đang trên đường test đỉnh, thì VNIndex gần như vươt qua đỉnh cũ, lấy lại hết những gì đã mất. Chỉ số đo độ biến động/rủi ro thị trường chứng khoán VN đã hạ nhiệt rất nhanh, thậm chí còn về thấp hơn cả giai đoạn trước “Black Swan”.

Tất cả diễn biến đó làm nhà đầu tư vào VN cảm giác như tự thân nó có thể chinh phục mọi đỉnh cao nếu không có cú shock nào từ bên ngoài.

FINANDLIFE

Tags:

Economics | Psychology | StockAdvisory

AUTOFEED

DISCLAIMER

Blog này phục vụ cho mục đích lưu trữ, tham khảo thông tin và thảo luận. Chúng tôi không đảm bảo tính chắc chắn và không chịu trách nhiệm khi người sử dụng thông tin từ website cho hoạt động đầu tư, mua bán chứng khoán của mình.

Designed by: Nguyễn Chí Hiếu