NGHỊ ĐỊNH 65/2022 PHÁT HÀNH TRÁI PHIẾU DOANH NGHIỆP

by finandlife17/10/2022 08:09

Tags:

Economics

Monetary Policy and Price Stability

by finandlife29/08/2022 17:37

Chair Jerome H. Powell

Thank you for the opportunity to speak here today.

At past Jackson Hole conferences, I have discussed broad topics such as the ever-changing structure of the economy and the challenges of conducting monetary policy under high uncertainty. Today, my remarks will be shorter, my focus narrower, and my message more direct.

The Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) overarching focus right now is to bring inflation back down to our 2 percent goal. Price stability is the responsibility of the Federal Reserve and serves as the bedrock of our economy. Without price stability, the economy does not work for anyone. In particular, without price stability, we will not achieve a sustained period of strong labor market conditions that benefit all. The burdens of high inflation fall heaviest on those who are least able to bear them.

Restoring price stability will take some time and requires using our tools forcefully to bring demand and supply into better balance. Reducing inflation is likely to require a sustained period of below-trend growth. Moreover, there will very likely be some softening of labor market conditions. While higher interest rates, slower growth, and softer labor market conditions will bring down inflation, they will also bring some pain to households and businesses. These are the unfortunate costs of reducing inflation. But a failure to restore price stability would mean far greater pain.

The U.S. economy is clearly slowing from the historically high growth rates of 2021, which reflected the reopening of the economy following the pandemic recession. While the latest economic data have been mixed, in my view our economy continues to show strong underlying momentum. The labor market is particularly strong, but it is clearly out of balance, with demand for workers substantially exceeding the supply of available workers. Inflation is running well above 2 percent, and high inflation has continued to spread through the economy. While the lower inflation readings for July are welcome, a single month's improvement falls far short of what the Committee will need to see before we are confident that inflation is moving down.

We are moving our policy stance purposefully to a level that will be sufficiently restrictive to return inflation to 2 percent. At our most recent meeting in July, the FOMC raised the target range for the federal funds rate to 2.25 to 2.5 percent, which is in the Summary of Economic Projection's (SEP) range of estimates of where the federal funds rate is projected to settle in the longer run. In current circumstances, with inflation running far above 2 percent and the labor market extremely tight, estimates of longer-run neutral are not a place to stop or pause.

July's increase in the target range was the second 75 basis point increase in as many meetings, and I said then that another unusually large increase could be appropriate at our next meeting. We are now about halfway through the intermeeting period. Our decision at the September meeting will depend on the totality of the incoming data and the evolving outlook. At some point, as the stance of monetary policy tightens further, it likely will become appropriate to slow the pace of increases.

Restoring price stability will likely require maintaining a restrictive policy stance for some time. The historical record cautions strongly against prematurely loosening policy. Committee participants' most recent individual projections from the June SEP showed the median federal funds rate running slightly below 4 percent through the end of 2023. Participants will update their projections at the September meeting.

Our monetary policy deliberations and decisions build on what we have learned about inflation dynamics both from the high and volatile inflation of the 1970s and 1980s, and from the low and stable inflation of the past quarter-century. In particular, we are drawing on three important lessons.

The first lesson is that central banks can and should take responsibility for delivering low and stable inflation. It may seem strange now that central bankers and others once needed convincing on these two fronts, but as former Chairman Ben Bernanke has shown, both propositions were widely questioned during the Great Inflation period.1 Today, we regard these questions as settled. Our responsibility to deliver price stability is unconditional. It is true that the current high inflation is a global phenomenon, and that many economies around the world face inflation as high or higher than seen here in the United States. It is also true, in my view, that the current high inflation in the United States is the product of strong demand and constrained supply, and that the Fed's tools work principally on aggregate demand. None of this diminishes the Federal Reserve's responsibility to carry out our assigned task of achieving price stability. There is clearly a job to do in moderating demand to better align with supply. We are committed to doing that job.

The second lesson is that the public's expectations about future inflation can play an important role in setting the path of inflation over time. Today, by many measures, longer-term inflation expectations appear to remain well anchored. That is broadly true of surveys of households, businesses, and forecasters, and of market-based measures as well. But that is not grounds for complacency, with inflation having run well above our goal for some time.

If the public expects that inflation will remain low and stable over time, then, absent major shocks, it likely will. Unfortunately, the same is true of expectations of high and volatile inflation. During the 1970s, as inflation climbed, the anticipation of high inflation became entrenched in the economic decisionmaking of households and businesses. The more inflation rose, the more people came to expect it to remain high, and they built that belief into wage and pricing decisions. As former Chairman Paul Volcker put it at the height of the Great Inflation in 1979, "Inflation feeds in part on itself, so part of the job of returning to a more stable and more productive economy must be to break the grip of inflationary expectations."2

One useful insight into how actual inflation may affect expectations about its future path is based in the concept of "rational inattention."3 When inflation is persistently high, households and businesses must pay close attention and incorporate inflation into their economic decisions. When inflation is low and stable, they are freer to focus their attention elsewhere. Former Chairman Alan Greenspan put it this way: "For all practical purposes, price stability means that expected changes in the average price level are small enough and gradual enough that they do not materially enter business and household financial decisions."4

Of course, inflation has just about everyone's attention right now, which highlights a particular risk today: The longer the current bout of high inflation continues, the greater the chance that expectations of higher inflation will become entrenched.

That brings me to the third lesson, which is that we must keep at it until the job is done. History shows that the employment costs of bringing down inflation are likely to increase with delay, as high inflation becomes more entrenched in wage and price setting. The successful Volcker disinflation in the early 1980s followed multiple failed attempts to lower inflation over the previous 15 years. A lengthy period of very restrictive monetary policy was ultimately needed to stem the high inflation and start the process of getting inflation down to the low and stable levels that were the norm until the spring of last year. Our aim is to avoid that outcome by acting with resolve now.

These lessons are guiding us as we use our tools to bring inflation down. We are taking forceful and rapid steps to moderate demand so that it comes into better alignment with supply, and to keep inflation expectations anchored. We will keep at it until we are confident the job is done.

1. See Ben Bernanke (2004), "The Great Moderation," speech delivered at the meetings of the Eastern Economic Association, Washington, February 20; Ben Bernanke (2022), "Inflation Isn't Going to Bring Back the 1970s," New York Times, June 14. Return to text

2. See Paul A. Volcker (1979), "Statement before the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress, October 17, 1979," Federal Reserve Bulletin, vol. 65 (November), p. 888. Return to text

3. A review of the applications of rational inattention in monetary economics appears in Christopher A. Sims (2010), "Rational Inattention and Monetary Economics," in Benjamin M. Friedman and Michael Woodford, eds., Handbook of Monetary Economics, vol. 3 (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 155–81. Return to text

4. See Alan Greenspan (1989), "Statement before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, U.S. Senate, February 21, 1989," Federal Reserve Bulletin, vol. 75 (April), pp. 274–75. Return to text

Last Update: August 26, 2022

Tags: ,

Economics

KINH TẾ VĨ MÔ 8 THÁNG SÁNG TRONG BỐI CẢNH TOÀN CẦU

by finandlife29/08/2022 17:01

"Be the chief but never the lord." Lao Tzu

Tổng cục thống kê (TCTK) công bố số liệu kinh tế tháng 8 với các kết quả vĩ mô chính đều cho thấy sự phục hồi, trong khi lạm phát tiếp tục được kiểm soát:

            Chỉ số sản xuất (IIP) toàn ngành công nghiệp trong tháng 8 tăng 2,9% so với tháng trước (MoM) và 15,6% so với cùng kỳ (YoY), giúp IIP 8 tháng 2022 tăng 9,4% YoY. Lĩnh vực sản xuất, chế biến, chế tạo tiếp tục đóng vai trò là động lực tăng trưởng chính với mức tăng 16,2% YoY trong tháng 8 và 10,4% YoY trong 8T 2022.

            Tổng mức bán lẻ hàng hóa và dịch vụ tháng 8 tăng 0,6% MoM và tăng mạnh 50,2% YoY trên mức cơ sở thấp của tháng 8/2021. Tính chung 8T 2022, tổng mức bán lẻ tăng 19,3% YoY, nếu loại trừ yếu tố giá tăng 15,1% YoY, trong khi cùng 8T 2021 giảm lần lượt 3,5% và 5,1%.

            Kim ngạch xuất khẩu tháng 8 tăng 9,1% MoM và 22,1% YoY lên 22,4 tỷ USD, trong khi nhập khẩu tăng 1,4% MoM và 12,4% YoY, đạt 31 tỷ USD, dẫn dến xuất siêu 2,42 tỷ USD. Tính chung 8T 2022, tổng kim ngạch xuất nhập khẩu lần lượt đạt 250,8 tỷ USD (+17,3% YoY) và 246,8 tỷ USD (+13,6% YoY), xuất siêu 3,96 tỷ USD, trong khi 8T 2021 nhập siêu 3,52 tỷ USD.

            Giải ngân vốn đầu tư FDI tăng 10,5% YoY, đạt 12,8 tỷ USD, mặc dù FDI đăng ký giảm 12,3% YoY, đạt 16,8 tỷ USD.

            Chỉ số giá tiêu dùng (CPI) tháng 8 tăng 2,89% YoY và gần như không đổi so với tháng 7. Giá cả một số hàng hóa, dịch vụ thiết yếu và học phí tăng trước mùa khai giảng năm học mới được trung hòa bởi giá xăng dầu bán lẻ thấp hơn trong tháng 8. Lạm phát bình quân 8T 2022 tiếp tục duy trì ở mức thấp, tăng 2,58% YoY.

VCSC Research

Tags:

Economics

TOP 20 NGÂN HÀNG DUY TRÌ TĂNG TRƯỞNG TỐT TRONG Q2, ROE GẦN 18%

by finandlife24/08/2022 09:04

“I am a little slow. Could you share a short note on the company that I can read at my own pace, so I come prepared for the meeting? I absorb better when I read slowly.”

 “It is ok to be ‘slow’ – but it is not ok to be shallow.” Noname

Tags:

Economics | Stocks

ETFs ngày càng thu hút nhiều vốn hơn Hedge Funds

by finandlife15/08/2022 11:14

"He who talks more is sooner exhausted." Lao Tzu

Nguồn: ETFGI

Tags:

Economics | Psychology | StockAdvisory

DISCLAIMER

I am currently serving as an Investment Manager at Vietcap Securities JSC, leveraging 16 years of experience in investment analysis. My journey began as a junior analyst at a fund in 2007, allowing me to cultivate a profound understanding of Vietnam's macroeconomics, conduct meticulous equity research, and actively pursue lucrative investment opportunities. Furthermore, I hold the position of Head of Derivatives, equipped with extensive knowledge and expertise in derivatives, ETFs, and CWs.

 

To document my insights and share personal perspectives, I maintain a private blog where I store valuable information. However, it is essential to acknowledge that the content provided on my blog is solely based on my own opinions and does not carry a guarantee of certainty. Consequently, I cannot assume responsibility for any trading or investing activities carried out based on the information shared. Nonetheless, I wholeheartedly welcome any questions or inquiries you may have. You can contact me via email at thuong.huynhngoc@gmail.com.

 

Thank you for your understanding, and I eagerly anticipate engaging with you on topics concerning investments and finance.

Designed by: Nguyễn Chí Hiếu